A judge aborted a drug conspiracy trial Tuesday after some jurors were found to have been playing the puzzle game Sudoku while evidence was being given.
Sydney District Court Judge Peter Zahra ended the trial Tuesday for two men facing a possible life sentence for drug conspiracy charges. The trial had been running for 66 days and had cost taxpayers an estimated 1 million Australian dollars (US$950,000).
The judge was alerted after it was observed the jurors were writing vertically, rather than horizontally. It had been assumed they were taking notes.
"Yes, it helps me keep my mind busy paying more attention," the jury foreman told the judge Tuesday. "Some of the evidence is rather drawn out and I find it difficult to maintain my attention the whole time, and that doesn't distract me too much from proceedings."
Jurors in the trial are anonymous and no action can be taken against them for the puzzle playing.
The foreman admitted to the judge four to five jurors were playing puzzle games for up to half the time the trial had been going.
"Jurors are sort of the judges of the facts and it's very disappointing they weren't giving our clients a fair trial," said Robyn Hakelis, a lawyer for one of the defendants.
A new trial is expected to begin in a few weeks.
Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Also on AOL Australia:
National: Toyota to produce hybrids in Australia
International: Tokyo stabbing suspect unapologetic
Business: AT&T to take earnings hit from iPhone subsidies
Sport: FIFA ends Vukovic dream
Offbeat: British Man Sentenced to Community Service For Burning Pile of Cash After Argument
Celebrity: Kate Beckinsale is Too Good at Sex to Cook
Movies: Robert De Niro Snubs Woody Allen Over High Demands
Lifestye: Mexico changes tourism ads with naked model
Fotozone: Olympic Pandas
Men: UK's Sexiest Bid for Candidacy
TV: Sexiest Celebrity Tattoos
Games: Call of Duty: World at War Revealed?
